The thing abt “social housing” existing in our current system is that every CLT is financed w the same subsidy tools and regulatory requirements as any given NYSAFAH development, and therefore limited in the same exact ways cc @freecondohttps://twitter.com/DanielKayHertz/status/1437100308845432836 …
-
-
Of course it’s not just me—it’s a very active conversation among (some) CLTs—and then, it’s like anything (which was your point). To your second point: it’s complicated
, but less a principle, I think, than a reading of what routinely happens to public resources. But yes. -
Right so having a CLT-like structure that deepens resident engagement/buy-in can actually protect a public resource But you still need capital And you still need to scale
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
